A publication of the American Academy of Pediatrics reveals:
“The “natural” option does not align consistently with public health goals. If doing what is “natural” is “best” in the case of breastfeeding, how can we expect mothers to ignore that powerful and deeply persuasive worldview when making choices about vaccination?”
Excellent question. Another question missing in this article: who benefits from these “public health goals” and how healthy is it really to inject known neurotoxins, carcinogens and mutagenic ingredients into anyone, let alone babies?
AAP members are now being asked to deliberately find ways to ignore and violate Natural Law.
“Promoting breastfeeding as “natural” may be ethically problematic, and, even more troublingly, it may bolster this belief that “natural” approaches are presumptively healthier. This may ultimately challenge public health’s aims in other contexts, particularly childhood vaccination.”
See? The AAP advises it is “ethically problematic” to promote breastfeeding as natural (still the case in all mammals), while routinely poisoning the blood of infants, killing and maiming many of them via compulsive mass vaccination (multiple vaccines per visit) is a perfectly legitimate “health aim”.
The AAP is looking more like a propaganda outlet for an American Academy of Predators. Intuition guided a quick follow up on the suspicion that the authors of this anti-breastfeeding article (thus anti-thriving-babies and anti-nature and life itself) come from the exact same school of thought as none other then Dr. Paul Offit. Yes, that Dr. Offit, trained to profit off the great deception which this brief and disastrous vaccine era in human history represents. Let’s remember history is just “his story”, in the eye (or I AM) of the beholder.
Pay attention, stay focused, use discernment. Love and thanks to all who are willing to be the change, to all who are reluctant to embrace new discoveries and may need it even more, for as long as it is welcome and received ❤